<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telegraph Twitterfall – where did it all go wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matthewparsons.net/2009/04/20/telegraph-twitterfall-%e2%80%93-where-did-it-all-go-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matthewparsons.net/2009/04/20/telegraph-twitterfall-%e2%80%93-where-did-it-all-go-wrong/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question time: TTG uses Twitter to quiz boss of Virgin Atlantic &#171;</title>
		<link>http://matthewparsons.net/2009/04/20/telegraph-twitterfall-%e2%80%93-where-did-it-all-go-wrong/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Question time: TTG uses Twitter to quiz boss of Virgin Atlantic &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeysthroughtravel.com/?p=1425#comment-531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] hopefully there&#8217;ll be none of the nonsense we saw a while ago with the Telegraph&#8217;s Twitterfall, but on ttglive.com we&#8217;ll be showing the questions that are being asked by the Twitter/Travel [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hopefully there&#8217;ll be none of the nonsense we saw a while ago with the Telegraph&#8217;s Twitterfall, but on ttglive.com we&#8217;ll be showing the questions that are being asked by the Twitter/Travel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Dória Weblog &#187; #Fail para a integração do Twitter</title>
		<link>http://matthewparsons.net/2009/04/20/telegraph-twitterfall-%e2%80%93-where-did-it-all-go-wrong/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Dória Weblog &#187; #Fail para a integração do Twitter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeysthroughtravel.com/?p=1425#comment-431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] alguns, o Telegraphy superestimou a maturidade dos usuários do Twitter. Para outros, tudo não passou de um primeiro [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alguns, o Telegraphy superestimou a maturidade dos usuários do Twitter. Para outros, tudo não passou de um primeiro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full &#8230; &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://matthewparsons.net/2009/04/20/telegraph-twitterfall-%e2%80%93-where-did-it-all-go-wrong/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full &#8230; &#187; malcolm coles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeysthroughtravel.com/?p=1425#comment-430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Telegraph had to briefly remove its budget twitterfall box after people deliberately tweeted #budget plus  swear words to make them appear on the Telegraph site. They filter out rude [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Telegraph had to briefly remove its budget twitterfall box after people deliberately tweeted #budget plus  swear words to make them appear on the Telegraph site. They filter out rude [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewparsons</title>
		<link>http://matthewparsons.net/2009/04/20/telegraph-twitterfall-%e2%80%93-where-did-it-all-go-wrong/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matthewparsons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeysthroughtravel.com/?p=1425#comment-427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment Peter. 

I guess it was on a pretty prominent place on the website, but I still think they should have left it longer... defintely a case of old media clashing with new media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Peter. </p>
<p>I guess it was on a pretty prominent place on the website, but I still think they should have left it longer&#8230; defintely a case of old media clashing with new media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Moore</title>
		<link>http://matthewparsons.net/2009/04/20/telegraph-twitterfall-%e2%80%93-where-did-it-all-go-wrong/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeysthroughtravel.com/?p=1425#comment-426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Matt,

Nice coverage of this today - but I really think that they had to take it down. Brits being British - it really could have ended up anywhere, and it was on a pretty prominent place on their website.

It was a good idea that wasn&#039;t really thought through - and it&#039;s a shame because it did all add up to a PR nightmare for them. I&#039;m still of the opinion that you can&#039;t really give people full access - there is still a need for an editor or moderator in the process at some point. 

They were a little too eager and it ended up being quite funny. There will be plenty of the old media lot who think that this is very funny, and the new media brigade could do with learning a lesson or two.

Good coverage and a nice little post.

Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>Nice coverage of this today &#8211; but I really think that they had to take it down. Brits being British &#8211; it really could have ended up anywhere, and it was on a pretty prominent place on their website.</p>
<p>It was a good idea that wasn&#8217;t really thought through &#8211; and it&#8217;s a shame because it did all add up to a PR nightmare for them. I&#8217;m still of the opinion that you can&#8217;t really give people full access &#8211; there is still a need for an editor or moderator in the process at some point. </p>
<p>They were a little too eager and it ended up being quite funny. There will be plenty of the old media lot who think that this is very funny, and the new media brigade could do with learning a lesson or two.</p>
<p>Good coverage and a nice little post.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

